To students of instructional design the introduction and subsequent “sorting out” of the various learning theories and associated instructional design strategies can be somewhat confusing. It was out of this feeling of cognitive dissonance that this site was born.
Why does it seem so difficult to differentiate between three basic theories of learning? Why do the names of theorists appear connected to more than one theory? Why do the terms and strategies of each theory overlap?
The need for answers to these questions sparked my investigation into the available literature on learning theories and their implications for instructional design. I found many articles and internet sites that dealt with learning theory and ID, in fact, it was difficult to know when and where to draw the line. When I stopped finding new information, and the articles were reaffirming what I had already read, I began to write.
The writing process was a learning experience for me and now that I have finished, I want to start over and make it even better, because I know more now than I did when I began. Every time I reread an article, there were ideas and lists that I would wish to add to my writing. Perhaps in further development of this site I will change and refine my presentation.
Reading about the development of learning theories and their connection to instructional design evoked, for me, many parallels with the development of other theories in sciences. I have included some of those thoughts as asides within the main body of text.
This article’s taken from the work of Brenda Mergel. I just put it here and convey the link to its orignal site. You can download the rest of this article here: Instructional design and learning theory.
Viewed 4491 times by 1479 viewers
[...] on Tue 18-11-2008 Activity 2.6 Social Learning Theory Saved by velociped on Fri 14-11-2008 Instructional Design and Learning Theory Saved by SandyBeach on Thu 13-11-2008 Clarity and Mathematics Saved by NickJonasRoxMyWorld on Sat [...]